Skip to content

Teaching efficacy · Student feedback

What students say.

Five academic years of course-evaluation data — 43 courses, 917 enrolled students, scored on the institution's 1–5 Likert scale.

Student voices

Anonymous  ·  verbatim from the institutional course-evaluation form

Bajorek is going to be the person to revitalize this department. He is intelligent, excited, motivated, and cares about his students. Best professor I have ever had.
— MUSA 441 — Teaching Instrumental Music K–12 · Spring 2022

Spring 2022 through fall 2025. Open-text comment fields are released unedited and unattributed by the institutional evaluation system; these excerpts are reproduced as written.

How to read this page

Numbers are scored 1–5, by students, anonymously.

At the end of every semester, every enrolled student is asked to rate their course on a five-point scale. Higher is better. The descriptors below come from the institution's own rubric.

  • 5 Exceptional — performance far above what is required.
  • 4 Above expectation — consistently above normal expectations.
  • 3 Successful — what's expected, considered acceptable.
  • 2 Below expectation — generally below minimum requirements.
  • 1 Unsatisfactory — does not meet minimum job requirements.

At a glance · five-year archive

Aggregates across 43 courses I taught from spring 2022 through fall 2025. Excludes any section with a single enrolled student.

Average rating

4.33 / 5

weighted by enrollment (917 students total) — sits in "Above expectation"

Above expectation

95%

of courses (41 of 43) earned a 4.0+ median

"Exceptional" courses

18 / 43

earned the highest possible 5.0 median

Students reached

917

across 5 academic years

Year over year

The longitudinal view.

Average rating and 'Above expectation' share by academic year. Reference lines mark the institution's rubric thresholds.

Average rating by academic year

Weighted average across all courses each AY. Dashed lines mark institutional rubric thresholds.

% of courses at 'Above expectation' or higher

Share of evaluated courses each AY where the median rating reached 4.0 or above.

By academic year

The five-year summary table.

Academic year Courses Students Avg rating Median 5.0 / 4.0+ Response

AY 2021–22

6 87 4.39 5.0 3 / 6 27%

AY 2022–23

10 225 4.43 4.5 4 / 10 45%

AY 2023–24

10 182 4.51 5.0 6 / 10 43%

AY 2024–25

10 213 4.19 4.0 3 / 8 41%

AY 2025–26

7 210 4.19 4.0 2 / 7 41%

Going back further

University of Florida, with peer benchmarks.

From my graduate-teaching years at UF (GatorRater system, which publishes department and college averages alongside individual instructor scores).

MUE 2460

Brass Skills I · Fall 2015

Overall 5.0 / 5
My score
4.91
Dept avg
4.48
College avg
4.45

+0.43 vs. Music Department average · +0.46 vs. College of the Arts average · 6 of 16 students responded (38%)

MUE 2462

Brass Skills II · Spring 2016

Overall 5.0 / 5
My score
4.96
Dept avg
4.43
College avg
4.44

+0.53 vs. Music Department average · +0.52 vs. College of the Arts average · 6 of 11 students responded (55%)

Composite of nine instructor-effectiveness items (objectives, communication, expectations, availability, respect, stimulation of interest, facilitation, enthusiasm, encouragement of independent thinking).

Notes & methodology

  • Source. Institutional course-evaluation system, spring 2022 through fall 2025 (CMU); plus two GatorRater reports from 2015–16 (UF). Every CRN with a published evaluation is included — methods, ensembles, and general education.
  • Scale. 1–5 Likert (Exceptional / Above Expectation / Successful / Below Expectation / Unsatisfactory). Each course evaluation contains a multi-item rubric; the institution reports both the median rating per course and the arithmetic mean. Both are shown above for transparency about the spread.
  • Aggregation. The five-year average is weighted by enrollment (a section of 70 students contributes more to the average than a section of 8). Single-student sections are excluded — at n=1 the rating is statistically meaningless.
  • Peer benchmarks. The UF data above includes department and college averages for the same item composite, published directly in the GatorRater report. CMU's evaluation system does not publish public peer benchmarks; the university average for assistant-professor instructors typically clusters in the 4.0–4.2 range nationally.
  • Selection of quotes. Verbatim from open-text comment fields, selected for thematic diversity. Full comment files are available on request.
  • Data refresh. scripts/extract-evals.py re-parses the PDF archive and regenerates this dashboard's data file. Re-run after each semester's evaluations are released.